Accessibility evidence

Named-scope Title II and 508 work: an evidence pack, then a first slice you can defend.

Section 508
ADA Title II
WCAG 2.1 AA
Named scope only
No citywide stamp
No overlay product

Public agencies are being asked to show their work. Most first calls are one question: how bad is this named property, and what does a first slice actually look like?

Named accessibility consulting, not a scan dump. I inventory the named set, rank what actually blocks a keyboard or screen-reader user, and hand over an evidence pack a procurement file can hold. A named first slice follows if the scope is honest.

This is not a citywide conformance stamp and not an overlay product. The file says what was in scope, what was left out, and who signed.

Same method as the rest of the practice: diagnose the operating system, map the risk or workflow, improve the procedure or digital tool, produce evidence and a usable handoff.

What you get

Evidence pack
What blocks a user, ranked
A named first slice if it fits
A file you can maintain

How accessible public systems runsSee the method

01Understand the operating system
02Map the risk or workflow
03Improve the procedure or digital tool
04Produce evidence and a usable handoff

Section 508
ADA Title II
WCAG 2.1 AA
Named scope only
No overlay product

Ask about thisStraight answer, no deck.